// WAR ROOM — Additional data for murder board improvements

const WAR_ROOM_EXTRA = {
  'M-2024-0312': {
    // ── JUDGE ANALYTICS ──
    judge: {
      name: 'Hon. Catherine Reynolds',
      court: 'U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York',
      appointed: 2014,
      appointedBy: 'Obama',
      yearsOnBench: 12,
      totalCases: 847,
      photo: null,
      stats: {
        msjGrantRate: 34,
        msjPartialRate: 28,
        avgTrialDuration: 5.2,
        avgTimeToTrial: 18.4,
        plaintiffWinRate: 58,
        avgDamagesAwarded: 8700000,
        settlementRate: 64,
        sanctionsIssued: 12,
      },
      rulingTendencies: [
        { area: 'Discovery Scope', lean: 'Broad', confidence: 85, note: 'Favors full production. Granted 78% of motions to compel in last 3 years.' },
        { area: 'Expert Testimony', lean: 'Moderate', confidence: 70, note: 'Applies Daubert rigorously but rarely excludes entirely. Limits scope in 40% of challenges.' },
        { area: 'Summary Judgment', lean: 'Skeptical', confidence: 75, note: 'Below-average grant rate (34%). Prefers jury resolution of fact disputes.' },
        { area: 'Damages', lean: 'Pro-Plaintiff', confidence: 65, note: 'Median award 15% above district average. Allows broad damages theories.' },
        { area: 'Trial Management', lean: 'Strict', confidence: 90, note: 'Enforces time limits. Expects pre-trial prep. Penalizes delays.' },
        { area: 'Sanctions', lean: 'Moderate', confidence: 60, note: 'Issues sanctions sparingly but firmly when warranted. 12 in career.' },
      ],
      priorCounselExperience: [
        { counsel: 'M. Kirkland (us)', appearances: 3, winRate: 67, note: 'Favorable relationship. Judge cited our brief in Reynolds v. Apex Holdings.' },
        { counsel: 'P. Caldwell (them)', appearances: 5, winRate: 60, note: 'Caldwell has won 3 of 5 before Reynolds, but 2 wins were default judgments.' },
      ],
      keyRulings: [
        { case: 'Thornton v. GreenTech (2024)', ruling: 'Denied MSJ on fraud claim — held scienter question for jury', relevance: 'high' },
        { case: 'Sterling v. Apex Holdings (2023)', ruling: 'Broad discovery order — compelled production of 5 years of financials', relevance: 'high' },
        { case: 'Park Industries v. Chen (2025)', ruling: 'Excluded expert on Daubert — methodology not peer-reviewed', relevance: 'medium' },
        { case: 'Ortiz Class Action (2024)', ruling: 'Awarded $12.4M — above expert estimate', relevance: 'medium' },
      ],
    },

    // ── JURY STRATEGY ──
    jury: {
      venueProfile: {
        district: 'S.D.N.Y.',
        pool: 'Manhattan — urban, educated, diverse. Historically plaintiff-friendly in commercial cases.',
        avgAge: 42,
        demographics: { white: 35, black: 22, hispanic: 28, asian: 12, other: 3 },
        education: { college: 68, postgrad: 24, highSchool: 8 },
      },
      idealJuror: {
        profile: 'Business-literate professional who understands fiduciary concepts. Skeptical of corporate insiders. Values transparency.',
        favorable: ['Finance/accounting background', 'Small business owners', 'Government employees', 'Teachers/educators', 'Anyone burned by financial fraud'],
        unfavorable: ['Corporate executives', 'Venture capital/PE background', 'Libertarian-leaning (anti-regulation)', 'Close ties to financial industry', 'Distrustful of large damage awards'],
      },
      voirDire: [
        { question: 'Have you ever invested money based on information that turned out to be misleading?', purpose: 'Identify empathy with plaintiff', priority: 'high' },
        { question: 'What does "fiduciary duty" mean to you?', purpose: 'Gauge financial literacy', priority: 'high' },
        { question: 'Do you believe corporations should be held to the same honesty standards as individuals?', purpose: 'Identify pro-corporate bias', priority: 'high' },
        { question: 'Have you or anyone close to you been involved in a business dispute?', purpose: 'Identify bias/experience', priority: 'medium' },
        { question: 'How do you feel about lawsuits seeking large monetary damages?', purpose: 'Identify damages skeptics', priority: 'high' },
        { question: 'Do you have experience reading financial statements or business reports?', purpose: 'Gauge ability to follow evidence', priority: 'medium' },
        { question: 'What news sources do you follow regularly?', purpose: 'Identify worldview indicators', priority: 'low' },
        { question: 'Have you ever served on a jury before? What was the outcome?', purpose: 'Identify holdout tendencies', priority: 'medium' },
      ],
      strikes: { peremptory: 3, forCause: 'Unlimited' },
      mockJurors: [
        { seat: 1, name: 'Juror A — Accountant', disposition: 'Favorable', confidence: 80, notes: 'Will understand the financials. Strong for us.' },
        { seat: 2, name: 'Juror B — Retail Manager', disposition: 'Neutral', confidence: 50, notes: 'No financial background. May struggle with complexity.' },
        { seat: 3, name: 'Juror C — Former Banker', disposition: 'Unfavorable', confidence: 30, notes: 'May sympathize with business judgment defense. Strike candidate.' },
        { seat: 4, name: 'Juror D — Teacher', disposition: 'Favorable', confidence: 75, notes: 'Values honesty. Good for fraud narrative.' },
        { seat: 5, name: 'Juror E — Software Engineer', disposition: 'Neutral', confidence: 55, notes: 'Analytical. Will follow evidence but may want more proof.' },
        { seat: 6, name: 'Juror F — Nurse', disposition: 'Favorable', confidence: 70, notes: 'Empathetic. Responds to betrayal narrative.' },
      ],
    },

    // ── DEPOSITION CLIPS / IMPEACHMENT BANK ──
    impeachmentBank: [
      { witness: 'James Harrington', page: '87', line: '14-22', quote: '"I had no involvement whatsoever in the creation of Apex Ventures."', impeachWith: 'Apex incorporation docs — Harrington listed as sole director and registered agent.', severity: 'critical', tag: 'Direct Contradiction' },
      { witness: 'James Harrington', page: '91', line: '3-8', quote: '"All related-party transactions were disclosed to the board in the ordinary course."', impeachWith: 'Board minutes Oct 2023 — no mention of Apex. Board member declarations confirm no disclosure.', severity: 'critical', tag: 'Direct Contradiction' },
      { witness: 'James Harrington', page: '112', line: '18-24', quote: '"The Q3 revenue projections were prepared by the finance team without my input."', impeachWith: 'Email MH-0012445 — Harrington personally revised projections upward, overriding CFO estimates.', severity: 'high', tag: 'Impeach with Document' },
      { witness: 'James Harrington', page: '134', line: '6-11', quote: '"I don\'t recall when I first learned about the revenue shortfall."', impeachWith: 'Email MH-0012460 dated Sept 15 — CFO emailed Harrington re: "significant Q3 miss" two weeks before board meeting.', severity: 'high', tag: 'Refresh Recollection' },
      { witness: 'James Harrington', page: '156', line: '1-9', quote: '"The transfers to Apex were legitimate vendor payments for consulting services."', impeachWith: 'No consulting agreement produced. No work product from Apex. Bank records show funds immediately transferred to personal account.', severity: 'critical', tag: 'No Corroboration' },
      { witness: 'Robert Chen (anticipated)', page: 'N/A', line: 'N/A', quote: 'Expected to claim privilege over board communications', impeachWith: 'Crime-fraud exception — if communications furthered the fraud, privilege is waived. Motion prepared.', severity: 'medium', tag: 'Privilege Challenge' },
    ],

    // ── RISK HEAT MAP ──
    riskMatrix: {
      claims: ['Breach of Contract', 'Fraud', 'Fiduciary Duty', 'Unjust Enrichment'],
      risks: [
        { factor: 'Statute of Limitations', scores: [90, 70, 85, 80], notes: ['Well within', '2 transfers may be barred', 'Discovery rule applies', 'Equitable tolling'] },
        { factor: 'Daubert Challenge', scores: [95, 85, 90, 85], notes: ['N/A — no expert needed', 'Mitchell methodology solid', 'N/A', 'Mitchell covers'] },
        { factor: 'Summary Judgment', scores: [80, 55, 75, 50], notes: ['Strong factual disputes', 'Scienter is weakest link', 'Self-dealing facts strong', 'May be barred if contract applies'] },
        { factor: 'Jury Comprehension', scores: [85, 70, 60, 75], notes: ['Simple breach story', 'Complex financial fraud', 'Legal concept — harder', 'Fallback — intuitive'] },
        { factor: 'Damages Proof', scores: [88, 82, 78, 65], notes: ['Direct losses clear', 'Mitchell report strong', 'Same damages model', 'Overlap issue'] },
        { factor: 'Privilege / Exclusion Risk', scores: [90, 75, 80, 90], notes: ['Clean evidence', 'Some emails challenged', 'Board minutes admitted', 'Clean'] },
        { factor: 'Witness Availability', scores: [85, 80, 70, 85], notes: ['All available', 'Osei may be reluctant', 'Need Osei + board members', 'Covered by existing'] },
      ],
    },

    // ── DAMAGES BREAKDOWN ──
    damagesBreakdown: [
      { category: 'Lost Profits (Direct)', low: 6200000, mid: 8400000, high: 10100000, color: '#3B82F6' },
      { category: 'Consequential Damages', low: 1800000, mid: 2900000, high: 4200000, color: '#8B5CF6' },
      { category: 'Disgorgement / Unjust Enrichment', low: 0, mid: 1400000, high: 2200000, color: '#06B6D4' },
      { category: 'Pre-judgment Interest', low: 500000, mid: 800000, high: 1200000, color: '#F59E0B' },
      { category: 'Punitive (if fraud proven)', low: 0, mid: 700000, high: 1000000, color: '#EF4444' },
    ],

    // ── SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION HISTORY ──
    negotiationHistory: [
      { date: 'Feb 10, 2026', party: 'Plaintiff', type: 'Demand', amount: 18700000, note: 'Initial demand — full expert high-end estimate' },
      { date: 'Feb 28, 2026', party: 'Defendant', type: 'Offer', amount: 1500000, note: 'Lowball — pre-discovery posturing' },
      { date: 'Mar 15, 2026', party: 'Plaintiff', type: 'Counter', amount: 15000000, note: 'Reduced slightly after amended complaint filed' },
      { date: 'Mar 30, 2026', party: 'Defendant', type: 'Offer', amount: 2800000, note: 'Modest increase after our motion to compel granted' },
      { date: 'Apr 12, 2026', party: 'Defendant', type: 'Offer', amount: 3200000, note: 'Latest offer — post-production. Still well below EV.' },
    ],

    // ── COUNTER-OFFENSE BOARD ──
    counterOffense: [
      { action: 'Motion for Sanctions — Discovery Delay', status: 'Ready to File', priority: 'high', timing: 'File May 1 if supplemental production incomplete', impact: 'Pressure + fee shifting', assignee: 'L. Torres' },
      { action: 'Subpoena Apex Ventures Bank Records', status: 'Drafted', priority: 'high', timing: 'Serve immediately — before discovery cutoff', impact: 'Complete money trail', assignee: 'J. Park' },
      { action: 'Depose Controller R. Davis', status: 'Notice Served', priority: 'high', timing: 'May 1 — 13 days before cutoff', impact: 'Fill gaps in Q3 2022 records', assignee: 'L. Torres' },
      { action: 'Motion in Limine — Exclude BJR Defense', status: 'Research Phase', priority: 'medium', timing: 'File with pretrial motions Jun 1', impact: 'Narrow defense theory at trial', assignee: 'M. Kirkland' },
      { action: 'Daubert Preemptive Brief', status: 'Drafting', priority: 'medium', timing: 'File proactively before defense challenges Mitchell', impact: 'Control the narrative on expert admissibility', assignee: 'J. Park' },
      { action: 'Third-Party Discovery — Meridian Auditor', status: 'Planning', priority: 'low', timing: 'Only if production gaps persist', impact: 'Independent verification of financials', assignee: 'L. Torres' },
      { action: 'Protective Order for Trial Exhibits', status: 'Not Started', priority: 'low', timing: 'Pretrial conference Jun 2', impact: 'Prevent defense from excluding key docs', assignee: 'J. Park' },
    ],

    // ── TRIAL CHECKLIST ──
    trialChecklist: [
      { item: 'Witness subpoenas served', done: true, due: 'Apr 15', category: 'Witnesses' },
      { item: 'Expert reports exchanged', done: true, due: 'Apr 02', category: 'Experts' },
      { item: 'Deposition designations submitted', done: true, due: 'Apr 18', category: 'Discovery' },
      { item: 'Exhibit list filed', done: false, due: 'May 20', category: 'Exhibits' },
      { item: 'Motions in limine filed', done: false, due: 'Jun 01', category: 'Motions' },
      { item: 'Proposed jury instructions submitted', done: false, due: 'Jun 08', category: 'Jury' },
      { item: 'Pretrial brief filed', done: false, due: 'Jun 15', category: 'Briefing' },
      { item: 'Witness prep sessions — Redstone', done: true, due: 'Apr 12', category: 'Witnesses' },
      { item: 'Witness prep sessions — Mitchell', done: true, due: 'Apr 14', category: 'Witnesses' },
      { item: 'Witness prep sessions — Osei', done: false, due: 'May 05', category: 'Witnesses' },
      { item: 'Trial technology setup / dry run', done: false, due: 'Jul 10', category: 'Logistics' },
      { item: 'Opening statement finalized', done: false, due: 'Jul 12', category: 'Presentation' },
      { item: 'Closing argument outline', done: false, due: 'Jul 12', category: 'Presentation' },
      { item: 'Verdict form proposed', done: false, due: 'Jun 15', category: 'Jury' },
    ],
  },
};

window.WAR_ROOM_EXTRA = WAR_ROOM_EXTRA;